home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
- Path: news.muc.de!greenie!gert
- From: gert@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering)
- Subject: Re: Q: Class 2 vs Class 2.0
- Organization: GreeniE
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 10:10:57 GMT
- Message-ID: <DpDwA9.BtK@greenie.muc.de>
- References: <314806F3.55AF@none.com> <4i97ds$q2q@nntp1.best.com> <pumaDoHB8y.LrI@netcom.com> <314e0ca6.43085862@news1.io.org> <4j7l55$p4c@tribune.cris.com> <4j81vn$aqc@lori.albany.net>
-
- akozak@hourglass.com (Al Kozakiewicz) writes:
-
- >>>puma@netcom.com (Gary Breuckman) wrote:
-
- >>>>Even USR, who insisted on waiting for 2.0 and would not support Class
- >>>>2, issues software with the modem that requires you to use Class 1.
- >>>>Shame Shame.
-
- >An even bigger shame is that although the USR box says the mode is Class 2.0
- >complaint, it does not work with any class 2.0 software that expects compliance
- >with the full standard. ZetaFAX being a prime example.
-
- Oh, while the USR fax implementation has one minor flaw (the received line
- count is returned as decimal number, not hexadecimal -- which is completely
- harmless), it conforms to the class 2.0 standard well enough that any
- conforming program should work.
-
- Maybe the problem is in ZetaFAX? Mgetty+sendfax and Hylafax work fine with
- the USR in class 2.0 mode...
-
- gert
- --
- Yield to temptation ... it may not pass your way again! -- Lazarus Long
- //www.muc.de/~gert
- Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
- fax: +49-89-3243328 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
-